A few days back - after a really long time - I saw an excellent debate on NDTV about Kapil Sibal's controversial 3 language formula that seems to have rekindled old anti-Hindi passions. Now, being a 1980s-born guy, I haven't had first-hand experience of the anti-Hindi agitations in the 1960s. I do know Hindi was to become the sole official language in 1965, and I also know there were large-scale protests against this, especially in Tamil Nadu. For those not in the know, Kapil Sibal has proposed that schools adopt a three language formula, with English and Hindi as two of them. Though the matter has been extensively debated and written about, I feel compelled to put my two cents in. I'll beat around the bush a little first and come to the formula later.
Hindi and National Integration
When Vallabhbhai Patel set about integrating 562 kingdoms and numerous provinces into what we know today as India, our leaders were keen to identify, and establish, opportunities for national integration. This was a time when secession from the Union was a very real threat, thus prompting the likes of Nehru and Gandhi to try and integrate the country in spirit, and not just politically. This, and the urge to uproot all things colonial, spurred the efforts to replace English with an Indian language. Gandhi pushed for Hindustani -the utilitarian blend of Hindi and Urdu- as the national language. Even Rajagopalachari was in favour of establishing Hindustani as the national language. Nehru, the eternal democrat, proposed that linguists evolve a simplified version of Hindustani that South Indians could learn with ease.
Post-partition, however, the Jana Sangh and other Hindi groups pushed for the 'purification' of the language by ridding it of its Urdu influences. Eventually, after the violent protests in Tamil Nadu in 1965, Lal Bahadur Shastri, himself an advocate of Hindi, permitted the use of English alongside Hindi for conducting business in India. In addition, states were left free to conduct their business in the language of their choice.
Circa 2009. Apart from secessionary tendencies in some North-Eastern states and J&K, India is largely a united nation. While the motive of designating a national language made sense in a volatile and brittle post-partition India, the current obsession with establishing a "common link" stems from a puerile notion of national integration. National integration is not about making Tamilian children learn Hindi, teaching Malayalis to do the bhangra, or forcing Gujaratis to eat maacher jhol. National integration is about tolerance; about peaceful coexistence of culturally diverse communities; about every Indian acknowledging every other Indian an equal citizen- an ideal I think India has achieved (with the caste system and occasional riots as notable exceptions).
Isn't it better to have Hindi rather than English as the universal language of communication? At least it's not a foreign language.
No. When you have 22 national languages and want to make one of them the sole official language, efforts by one language to assert itself will obviously be seen as one-upmanship. This is exactly what happened with Hindi. In such an environment, it's best to let the language of global commerce stay as the language of communication within the country and let the regional languages develop and spread to other parts of the country through cinema and literature, which Rajnikanth and Bollywood do with tremendous success.
English is the undisputed language of global commerce, and hence the ultimate functional language, as most panelists in the debate agreed. Those who cite examples of France and Japan perhaps don't realize that a lion's share of our GDP comes from services, and that's thanks, in no small measure, to the urban youth's knowledge of English. So all the "foreign language" sentiment against English fails in the face of practicality and convenience.
Sibal and the three-language formula
Kapil Sibal, the poster-boy of radical education reforms, mooted the idea of teaching children three languages, two of which should be English and Hindi. The first pleasant observation is he understands knowledge of English is necessary; the second pleasant observation is the room given to students to learn any language of their choice; the third observation is what's causing all the hungama- why Hindi?
Hindi, as an early critic of the Hindi movement said, is just another regional language. It is the most-spoken language in the country, but is by no means a language of the majority of the country. It does not even serve a functional purpose; so it is absolutely pointless for a child in a remote Tamil Nadu village to learn five paryayvaachi shabd for 'elephant'.
A common grouse among all Indians is their inability to communicate in the southern states. Shouldn't there be a language all Indians should speak? Doesn't it give us a national identity? Yes, there should. No, it doesn't. It will be nice if a Haryanvi can communicate freely in Kerala, but it's not the government's business to decide what that language should be. Anyway, are things really that bad? Some people in every state do know Hindi and English, and I've never heard of anybody unable to survive in an Indian state because of a language problem. And about national identity, isn’t our national identity the multitude of languages? Isn’t it something we boast about to the firangs?
The three-language formula, stripped of its specifics, is an excellent proposal. It is a great idea to teach children two Indian languages. It is good not only for their individual development, but also for giving regional languages a pan-India appeal. I know Sibal is not a Hindi hardliner; he just has a misplaced notion of establishing linguistic uniformity in a country that takes pride in its linguistic diversity.
For me, the best way to structure the three-language formula is to let the children learn any 2 Indian languages. I have absolutely no doubt many parents will choose Hindi. But if a Kannadiga family is living in West Bengal, it might want its children to learn Bengali and Kannada- something the current formula does not allow.
Finally, as Mukul Kesavan said in the debate, there is a difference between learning a language and being literate in it. People watch Hindi movies and understand rudimentary Hindi without knowing the Devnagri script. That should suffice. Must every child in the country be able to read Premchand and Maithili Sharan Gupt?
13 comments:
Good one. I didn't hear about the issue myself, but I think that this is exactly what I would have written if I chose to address it.
I think there are nuances to it. The way languages are taught in schools varies a lot and a lot of our education system is primarily focused on exams rather than real learning. I don't know even if kids are taught any 2 Indian languages, the teachers would be able to impart to them the spirit of the language. In any case, I think proposals are always made in India without any real drive to implement them. I won't be surprised if this issue dies its natural death.
... about every Indian acknowledging every other Indian an equal citizen- an ideal I think India has achieved (with the caste system and occasional riots as notable exceptions).
Wow. Really?
@Siddarth
I guess you could add more notable exceptions to it, but largely, yes. I believe not many would want any state to secede from India.
@Mayank
You can write tomes on implementation of government schemes. The least they can do is get the policy right.
@Bui
Thanks :)
I would disagree at few points, The need for nationalism still exists courtesy our beloved politicians. yes, secession is not a threat but divisive/hate politics are and has potential to disrupt normal life for people coming from outside. Hindi can be done away but why one should be forced with xyz regional language if english can be used as his business language?
@anon
I agree there is much scope for more national integration. As Siddarth highlighted, and I replied, our society still has its biases- however, imposing Hindi is only going to exacerbate the problem.
About forcing children to learn regional languages, people generally desire to know more than one language, and it's easier to develop linguistic skills at an early age. The specifics can be worked out- should foreign languages also be included in the options, should both regional languages be taught from Class 1 to 10, etc ? At least, let them get the broad policy right first.
Nice post. I wasn't aware of the issue. And I find no reason to disagree with anything you have said.
Foreign language would be a good option and would definetly help in his/her career but this one can choose after he has his goals set and can pick the one that suits best acc to his need. you should also consider that if a child learns language other than his language of birth it would make him more tolerant and would give him better understanding of different cultures.
Three language formula would be an equal bargain for everyone, It would be like English + mother language + regional language(for everyone).
There is a need today to contain inflated regionalism, in many parts it has been blown out of proportion due to some reason or other and if we leave the situation as it is, our beloved netas will do leave no stone unturned to make this worse.
My fear arise from the delicate sensitivity which multicultural society possess which I too have felt lately.
I must admit here that earlier i didn't go through your blog properly, almost all my points are more or less in sync with yours, earlier i found your views too critical towards the three language formula which i thought doesn't deserved that much bashing :)
I agree with Mayank over here. Just as a case in point, I wanted to take Hindi as my IInd language in School, but was discouraged because it was not necessarily perceived as being a scoring subject.
I think Sibal has got his heart in the right place but as you have mentioned, it must not be an imposition. I am all for the two language formula for I think that it would help in protecting and at the same time, help in understanding other cultures better which in a way is the very basic tenet of Indian society
Vey lucid post and can't disagree with any of your points. Interesting narrative on a topic that has captured much attention of late...though wish that you got to B-School sooner :P
@Muttiah
You guys are right, but the obsession with marks applies to our education system as a whole, so we must treat it as a given.
As for B-school, I hope my plan doesn't, to borrow Mayank's phrase, die its natural death.
Fantastic op-ed da, wish I'd read earlier. It's becoming weird, this linguistic chauvinism. Now, Kannadigas want in-state people to write the KCET in Kannada only. Why? Is it not enough that you live in Karnataka and can speak Kannada? I think it boils down to globalization. People are afraid of losing their own specific identity and are screaming hoarse about it.
[COLOR="Red"][B]Click on the pictures to view in full size[/B][/COLOR]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=13383][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/11/Katrina Kaif-314.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=8825][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/11/Katrina Kaif-309.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=8822][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/11/Katrina Kaif-306.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/details.php?image_id=4238][IMG]http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/data/thumbnails/11/Katrina_Kaif-99.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[url=http://www.wallpaperhungama.in/cat-Asin-32.htm][b]Katrina Kaif Hot Wallpapers[/b][/url]
Photo gallery at t WallpaperHungama.in is dedicated to Katrina Kaif Pictures. Click on the thumbnails on enlarged Katrina Kaif pictures, exclusive photographs and debarring photos. Also constraint to other Pictures Gallery representing Turbulent property and Strong Resolution portrait scans, silver screen captures, cinema promos, wallpapers, hollywood & bollywood pictures, photos of actresses and celebrities
Post a Comment